Customer claims Skechers VivoCity charged S$0.50 for carrier without informing her

Customer claims Skechers VivoCity charged S$0.50 for carrier without informing her

Consumer upset about S$.50 provider demand at Skechers VivoCity

Not long ago, news of nearby institutions these kinds of as BreadTalk charging prospects for plastic carriers has produced rounds on the internet, much to the disappointment of lots of.

Dismay right after BreadTalk S’pore imposes S$.10 plastic bag charge

The hottest to arrive to the fore for equivalent explanations is footwear organization Skechers.

A shopper who patronised the VivoCity outlet claimed that she was charged S$.50 for a carrier bag without the need of currently being knowledgeable beforehand.

Only realised carrier demand after returning household

Yesterday (7 April), a Facebook person took to the Grievance Singapore team to share her experience with a provider cost at the Skechers outlet at VivoCity.

In the write-up, she said that she experienced acquired two pairs of shoes at the outlet.

Source: Facebook

When she checked the receipt on returning home, the customer realised that she experienced been charged S$.50 for the material bag employed to carry the shoeboxes.

Resource: Facebook

Alleging that the staff didn&#8217t tell her of the cost beforehand, the purchaser dubbed the incident a &#8220[daylight] robbery&#8221.

&#8220Has the paying out-for-baggage exercising absent way too significantly?&#8221 she lamented.

Supply: Facebook

She also wrote that had she recognized about the demand before, she could have determined no matter whether or not to get the bag or make the acquire at all.

Vendors need to be upfront about excess rates

In reaction to the write-up, just one Facebook user agreed that the outlet must have knowledgeable prospects of the charge, such as by a recognize.

On top of that, he urged customers to do their because of diligence by checking their costs prior to having to pay.

Resource: Fb

Meanwhile, some some others pointed out that the outlet should not have charged for the carrier as it was not designed of plastic.

Source: Fb

In distinct, 1 commenter claimed that vendors shouldn&#8217t impose costs for carriers that bear retail store logos.

She also termed for the authorities to implement rules for suppliers applying eco-friendly carriers. According to her, only supermarkets with a established turnover amount must be allowed to impose the supplemental bag fee.

Resource: Facebook

In July very last yr, all massive area grocery store operators started charging a minimal of S$.05 per plastic bag.

On the other hand, there is no this sort of rule for merchants.

MS Information has achieved out to Skechers for reviews.

Also examine: Dismay immediately after BreadTalk S’pore imposes S$.10 plastic bag cost

Dismay following BreadTalk S’pore imposes S$.10 plastic bag charge

Have information you need to share? Get in touch with us by means of e-mail at [email protected].

Showcased impression tailored from Facebook. 

The put up Purchaser statements Skechers VivoCity billed S$.50 for provider without informing her appeared initially on Have to Share Information – Unbiased Information For Singaporeans.